As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry important accountability for guaranteeing robust monetary outcomes for members1. In 2025, plan sponsors should concentrate on optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant schooling to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embrace crucial areas corresponding to goal date fund choice, price transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Focusing on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embrace:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluation
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Making the most of all obtainable info within the evaluation and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Creating efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key factors to contemplate. First, as with every funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in experiences produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s targets for the plan and general funding beliefs that can function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and establish TDFs which might be appropriate in your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We frequently see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes by way of the trouble of discovering an amazing funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding car.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio contains revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different circumstances, a plan may be eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) car with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these decisions or oversights end in plan members paying increased funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding car.
We advise plan sponsors take into account the affect on members of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for identical CIT technique. We suggest plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply larger price transparency and sometimes decrease general charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding critiques observe an identical format: a take a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a evaluation of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine critiques of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we propose supplementing with a periodic evaluation of the funding lineup construction, which means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re carried out with lively administration or passive administration. We advise this sort of evaluation a minimum of each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Basic Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To judge the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors ought to begin by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is acceptable or whether or not funding classes ought to be altered. Components for the dialogue may embrace participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Assets
In our 2024 Monetary Wellness within the Office Examine, staff reported spending a minimum of three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
Now we have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages may also help staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a major position — notably for workforces the place a big proportion of the inhabitants is just not at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff searching for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These personal conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Obligations
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of right now’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively affect an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly fluctuate from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and tasks
- Construct an onboarding schooling guidelines for brand new committee members
- Keep a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with schooling
- Affirm the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Traits in Litigation and Regulation
With important provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there may be the potential for brand new tax laws. Adjustments to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so it will likely be necessary for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to watch plan bills in order that they’re affordable for the providers supplied? You will need to word that this subject covers each vendor bills, corresponding to recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, corresponding to selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation relating to utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to cut back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on high of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal position in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, price effectivity, governance, and participant schooling, they will improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market circumstances, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making might be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant affect in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric offered herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such info is just not assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers supplied by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution is just not registered as a municipal advisor beneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
